Skip to content

OCPBUGS#49997: Enhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-fo… #95148

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2025

Conversation

dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

@dfitzmau dfitzmau commented Jun 24, 2025

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OCPBUGS-49997

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change (Miguel Barroso).
  • QE has approved this change (Weibin Liang).

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-low Referenced Jira bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@dfitzmau: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49997, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OCPBUGS-49997

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 24, 2025
@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OCPBUGS-49997 branch 2 times, most recently from 45cc3e0 to d7de6b4 Compare June 24, 2025 13:34
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 24, 2025
@dfitzmau dfitzmau changed the title OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-fo… OCPBUGS#49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-fo… Jun 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed jira/severity-low Referenced Jira bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@dfitzmau: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
OCPBUGS-49997

Link to docs preview:

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@dfitzmau dfitzmau changed the title OCPBUGS#49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-fo… OCPBUGS#49997: Enhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-fo… Jun 25, 2025
@weliang1
Copy link

weliang1 commented Jul 9, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 9, 2025
@dfitzmau dfitzmau added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 10, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux removed the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 10, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 15, 2025

@dfitzmau: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dfitzmau dfitzmau merged commit 34daca5 into openshift:main Jul 15, 2025
2 checks passed
@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #96111

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #96112

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #96113

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #95148 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.17":

Applying: OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #95148 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.16":

Applying: OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
M	modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-all-namespaces.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-particular-namespace.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-external-clients.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-create-cli.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-create-cli.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-external-clients.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-particular-namespace.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-all-namespaces.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
Auto-merging modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #95148 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.15":

Applying: OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
M	modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-all-namespaces.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-particular-namespace.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-external-clients.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-create-cli.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-create-cli.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-external-clients.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-particular-namespace.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-all-namespaces.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
Auto-merging modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #95148 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.14":

Applying: OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
M	modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-all-namespaces.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-particular-namespace.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-external-clients.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-create-cli.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-create-cli.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-external-clients.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-particular-namespace.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-all-namespaces.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
Auto-merging modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #95148 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.13":

Applying: OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
A	modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
M	modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-all-namespaces.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-particular-namespace.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-external-clients.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-create-cli.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-create-cli.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-external-clients.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-particular-namespace.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-all-namespaces.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation. Version OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation of modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc left in tree.
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: #95148 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12":

Applying: OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
A	modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc
M	modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-all-namespaces.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-particular-namespace.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-external-clients.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-create-cli.adoc
M	modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-networkpolicy-deny-all-allowed.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-create-cli.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-external-clients.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-particular-namespace.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-networkpolicy-allow-application-all-namespaces.adoc
Auto-merging modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/nw-multi-network-policy-differences.adoc
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation. Version OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation of modules/configuration-ovnk-multi-network-policy.adoc left in tree.
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OCPBUGS-49997: Inhanced the info for the k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/policy-for annotation

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants