Skip to content

8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes #26225

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

naotoj
Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj commented Jul 9, 2025

Replaced Collections.emptyList() with List.of() as part of refactoring. This was discussed in the context of investigating a CDS-related issue (https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357281?focusedId=14796714&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14796714). Although the root cause was ultimately determined to be user error, modernizing the code by using List.of() is still a desirable improvement


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26225/head:pull/26225
$ git checkout pull/26225

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26225
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26225/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26225

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26225

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26225.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 9, 2025

👋 Welcome back naoto! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 9, 2025

@naotoj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes

Reviewed-by: bpb, jlu, liach, cstein

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 32 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 9, 2025

@naotoj The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Jul 9, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@bplb bplb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@justin-curtis-lu justin-curtis-lu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks for fixing this.

@jdlib
Copy link

jdlib commented Jul 9, 2025

modernizing the code by using List.of() is still a desirable improvement

except that Collections.emptyList() and List.of() unfortunately have different tolerance to calls List.indexOf(null) and List.contains(null).

Copy link
Member

@liach liach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both lists aren't returned to users, so their null-hostile contains behavior has no impact.

@liach
Copy link
Member

liach commented Jul 9, 2025

An effort #25922 exists to make the AOT/CDS requirements more obvious to core libraries. Hope we can have this easier down the road.

@naotoj
Copy link
Member Author

naotoj commented Jul 10, 2025

Thanks for the reviews!

except that Collections.emptyList() and List.of() unfortunately have different tolerance to calls List.indexOf(null) and List.contains(null).

True in general, but as @liach mentioned, those singletons are internal use only so the difference is not relevant here.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Going to push as commit f5afbbd.
Since your change was applied there have been 40 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2025

@naotoj Pushed as commit f5afbbd.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants