Skip to content

feat: add support for PostgreSQL read replicas in OpenFGA configuration #1043

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

matthisholleville
Copy link

Description

Introduced detailed guidance on configuring OpenFGA with PostgreSQL read replicas to enhance performance and scalability. This update includes instructions for setting up primary and secondary datastores, considerations for synchronous vs. asynchronous replication, and best practices for ensuring data consistency and monitoring replication lag.

References

openfga/openfga#2479

Review Checklist

  • I have clicked on "allow edits by maintainers".
  • I have added documentation for new/changed functionality in this PR or in a PR to openfga.dev [Provide a link to any relevant PRs in the references section above]
  • The correct base branch is being used, if not main
  • I have added tests to validate that the change in functionality is working as expected

Introduced detailed guidance on configuring OpenFGA with PostgreSQL read replicas to enhance performance and scalability. This update includes instructions for setting up primary and secondary datastores, considerations for synchronous vs. asynchronous replication, and best practices for ensuring data consistency and monitoring replication lag.

Signed-off-by: Matthis Holleville <matthish29@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@DanCech DanCech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@matthisholleville
Copy link
Author

@aaguiarz FYI

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants