A cross-disciplinary framework integrating financial contagion models with supply chain network analysis for resilience assessment and policy guidance.
This research develops a novel framework that adapts financial systemic risk models to supply chain networks, introducing the concept of "too-central-to-fail" suppliers through systematic importance scoring methodologies. The framework provides quantitative foundations for supply chain regulation, early warning systems, and resilience enhancement strategies.
- 296 systemically important suppliers identified (59.2% of network)
- Moderate network resilience with 5.4% mean failure rate under random shocks
- High vulnerability to targeted attacks (up to 3.2% failure rates)
- Asymmetric spillover patterns with strongest contagion from suppliers to manufacturers (0.234)
- Financial contagion potential affecting 42.2% of network participants
network_analysis_supply_chain/
├── paper/ # LaTeX paper and documentation
│ └── journal_article_final_corrected.tex
├── figures/ # All visualization outputs
│ ├── network_topology.png
│ ├── risk_distributions.png
│ ├── correlation_heatmap.png
│ ├── spillover_heatmap.png
│ ├── monte_carlo_results.png
│ ├── attack_simulation.png
│ ├── cascade_simulation.png
│ └── percolation_analysis.png
├── data/ # Network data and metrics
│ ├── network_nodes.csv
│ ├── network_edges.csv
│ ├── risk_metrics.csv
│ ├── multi_tier_supply_network.json
│ ├── summary_statistics.json
│ └── stress_test_summary.json
├── analysis/ # Python analysis scripts
│ ├── main_analysis.py
│ ├── statistical_analysis.py
│ ├── stress_testing.py
│ ├── visualization_generation.py
│ └── verification_suite.py
└── README.md # This file
pip install networkx pandas numpy matplotlib seaborn scipy scikit-learn
-
Generate Network Data:
python analysis/main_analysis.py
-
Run Stress Tests:
python analysis/stress_testing.py
-
Create Visualizations:
python analysis/visualization_generation.py
-
Validate Results:
python analysis/verification_suite.py
- 500 nodes across 3 tiers (300 suppliers, 80 manufacturers, 120 retailers)
- 4,786 directed edges representing supplier-customer relationships
- Small-world properties with clustering coefficient 0.324 and average path length 3.47
- Mean systemic importance: 0.267 across all nodes
- High-risk suppliers: 296 nodes with SI > 0.2
- Financial fragility correlation: 0.657 with systemic importance
- Monte Carlo simulations: 5.364% mean failure rate (1000 runs)
- Targeted attacks: High-degree attacks most effective (3.2% max impact)
- Liquidity crisis: 42.2% network impact through financial contagion
- Percolation behavior: Gradual connectivity decline without critical thresholds
- Systemically important supplier identification based on adapted DebtRank methodology
- Tier-differentiated regulation based on asymmetric spillover patterns
- Stress testing protocols for supply chain risk assessment
- Early warning systems using network centrality and financial fragility indicators
- Cross-border dependency mapping using spillover analysis
- Regional regulatory harmonization focused on suppliers and manufacturers
- Risk-based intervention criteria for proactive supply chain management
- Figure 1: Network topology with systemic importance coloring
- Figure 2: Distribution of key risk metrics across nodes
- Figure 3: Correlation matrix of risk metrics
- Figure 4: Cross-sector spillover matrix visualization
- Figure 5: Monte Carlo simulation results distribution
- Figure 6: Progressive targeted attack results
- Figure 7: Liquidity crisis cascade propagation
- Figure 8: Network percolation analysis
@article{omoshola2025network,
title={Network Analysis for Systemic Risk Assessment in Supply Chains: A Cross-Disciplinary Framework Integrating Financial Contagion Models},
author={Omoshola, O.S.},
journal={Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing},
year={2025},
note={In preparation}
}
Omoshola S. Owolabi
Department of Data Science
Carolina University, Winston Salem - North Carolina, USA
Email: owolabio@carolinau.edu
This framework establishes foundations for:
- Evidence-based supply chain regulation
- Quantitative resilience assessment
- Cross-disciplinary risk modeling
- Policy-oriented network analysis
For detailed methodology, complete results, and validation protocols, see the full paper in the paper/
directory.