Ignore secrets in stub run

[FriederikeHanssen]

New feature

When running a pipeline with -stub-run , it would be helpful to be able to ignore secrets that are set in a process.

Use case

We are using stub to quickly prototype something and to check the channel logic, where we typically wouldn't want to do the actual tool call that requires the secret. Allowing to ignore the secrets directive would be very helpful so we don't need to setup mock secrets for testing

[bentsherman]

Related question -- do you think containers / conda packages should be loaded on a stub run? I've also seen this question come up and I can see arguments for both sides

[FriederikeHanssen]

hm good question. Same I can see both being useful, so I am also undecided about it. Bigger question: but did you ever consider configuration scope for stub runs?

[bentsherman]

That's an interesting idea. I will try it out when I have some time