Skip to content

Conversation

0xle0ne
Copy link
Member

@0xle0ne 0xle0ne commented Sep 10, 2025

close #1143

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 10, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 77.27273% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 64.96%. Comparing base (d79ab0c) to head (5525b03).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on nightly.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
bin/nanocl/src/utils/print.rs 75.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
bin/nanocl/src/commands/process.rs 83.33% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           nightly    #1292      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    65.09%   64.96%   -0.13%     
===========================================
  Files          283      283              
  Lines        15268    15285      +17     
===========================================
- Hits          9938     9930       -8     
- Misses        5330     5355      +25     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 64.96% <77.27%> (-0.13%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@0xle0ne 0xle0ne merged commit a79796a into nightly Sep 10, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature: Allow nanocl logs to support multiple process names

1 participant