Skip to content

Conversation

stellasia
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #416

@stellasia stellasia requested a review from a team as a code owner October 14, 2025 11:51
Copy link
Contributor

@NathalieCharbel NathalieCharbel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to keep track of my suggestion on how to deal with this, but needs further discussions offline to see whether it makes sense:
Keep the newly introduced param for LC compatibility i.e. LLMMessage but leave the invoke methods as they were before (i.e. without abstractions). The only drawback is that we will have the decorator for rate limit handling in all of the provider interfaces.

Approving this PR since it is just a revert and the solution can be done in a separate PR.

@stellasia stellasia merged commit 4f563e2 into main Oct 16, 2025
10 checks passed
@stellasia stellasia deleted the revert-416-feature/improved-llm-interface branch October 16, 2025 10:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants