Skip to content

constructor features #240

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 11, 2025
Merged

constructor features #240

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 11, 2025

Conversation

rsill-neo4j
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@angrykoala
Copy link
Member

I'm not too sure about calling the page constructor. Maybe Neo4jGraphQL would be a bit more explicit?

rsill-neo4j and others added 2 commits March 11, 2025 13:30
Co-authored-by: Michael Webb <28074382+mjfwebb@users.noreply.github.com>
@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Mar 11, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

Copy link
Contributor

@mjfwebb mjfwebb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 All backports created successfully

Status Branch Result
6.x
7.x

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation and see the Github Action logs for details

rsill-neo4j added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2025
[Cherry-pick][6.x] Merge pull request #240 from neo4j/constructor-features
rsill-neo4j added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2025
[Cherry-pick][7.x] Merge pull request #240 from neo4j/constructor-features
@rsill-neo4j rsill-neo4j deleted the constructor-features branch April 2, 2025 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants