Skip to content

Conversation

rsill-neo4j
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@AlexicaWright AlexicaWright left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm sure this is correct, but one question: the schema includes how nodes are related to each other, and if only the node labels and relationship types are analyzed, why use that procedure?

Co-authored-by: Jessica Wright <49636617+AlexicaWright@users.noreply.github.com>
@neo4j-docops-agent
Copy link
Collaborator

neo4j-docops-agent commented Jul 14, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@rsill-neo4j
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsill-neo4j commented Jul 14, 2025

I'm sure this is correct, but one question: the schema includes how nodes are related to each other, and if only the node labels and relationship types are analyzed, why use that procedure?

using this kind of meta data allows for elaborate AI-generated dashboards already - all without exposing the actual data to LLM processing, which is a major concern for many users

@AlexicaWright

@rsill-neo4j rsill-neo4j merged commit e9078fb into console Jul 14, 2025
4 checks passed
@rsill-neo4j rsill-neo4j deleted the schema-note-for-ai-dashboards branch July 14, 2025 11:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants