-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
Add support for quantifiers #3993
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Felipe R. Monteiro <felisous@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe R. Monteiro <felisous@amazon.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've only looked at the tests so far. I'm not sure that this makes sense to merge if the only kinds of harnesses that we can run are the ones in no_array.rs
. IMO the main benefit of quantifiers is quantifying over some collection (array, vector, ...), so we should either block this PR until that's possible, or I would expect to see some expected
tests to prove that it works.
Also, can we move the tests to expected
and have some assertions about particular properties that are being checked?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
This PR add support for quantifiers. Especially, we inline function calls in quantified expressions so that the result statement-expression can be accepted by the CBMC backend.
RFC: RFC 0010-quantifiers.
Resolves #2546 and #836.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.