Skip to content

docs: fixed broken build icon and added license link #2468

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Radovenchyk
Copy link

Description

Related Issue

Type of Change

  • Bug fix 🐛
  • New feature 🚀
  • Breaking change 🚨
  • Documentation update 📖
  • Refactor 🔨
  • Other (please describe) ⬇️

Screenshots (if applicable e.g before/after)

Checklist

  • I have tested these changes
  • I have updated relevant documentation (if applicable)
  • I have added necessary unit tests (if applicable)

Test Steps

Additional Notes / Context

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# MinIO Operator

![build](https://github.com/minio/operator/workflows/Go/badge.svg) ![license](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-AGPL%20V3-blue)
[![build](https://img.shields.io/badge/build-passing-green.svg)](https://github.com/minio/operator/actions) [![license](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-AGPL%20V3-blue)](https://github.com/minio/operator/blob/master/LICENSE)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why nest the link?

Copy link
Author

@Radovenchyk Radovenchyk Jun 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ramondeklein I think they should be there, all projects that use icons have a link to them. If you think they are unnecessary, then it might be better to remove them altogether.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants