Skip to content

.Net: fixed extension data in Model diagnostics #6275

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

TaoChenOSU
Copy link
Contributor

@TaoChenOSU TaoChenOSU commented May 15, 2024

Motivation and Context

Previously when an AI client starts a model diagnostics activity, it passes in an execution setting that is not parsed to a setting that is specific to the client. This creates an issue where the some of the settings cannot be read by the diagnostics module.

Description

Pass in the parsed setting to the diagnostics module. The diagnostics module will the serialize the object and deserialize it to PromptExecutionSettings to get the extension data.

image

Contribution Checklist

@TaoChenOSU TaoChenOSU requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2024 21:48
@TaoChenOSU TaoChenOSU self-assigned this May 15, 2024
@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft added .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code kernel Issues or pull requests impacting the core kernel labels May 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Taochen/otel model diagnostics fix extension data .Net: Taochen/otel model diagnostics fix extension data May 15, 2024
Copy link
Member

@stephentoub stephentoub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one unaddressed comment, otherwise lgtm

@TaoChenOSU TaoChenOSU changed the title .Net: Taochen/otel model diagnostics fix extension data .Net: fixed extension data in Model diagnostics May 16, 2024
@TaoChenOSU
Copy link
Contributor Author

one unaddressed comment, otherwise lgtm

Added the line back with a comment and the link to the issue.

@TaoChenOSU TaoChenOSU added this pull request to the merge queue May 16, 2024
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit a136cd4 May 16, 2024
15 checks passed
@TaoChenOSU TaoChenOSU deleted the taochen/otel-model-diagnostics-fix-extension-data branch May 16, 2024 16:33
LudoCorporateShark pushed a commit to LudoCorporateShark/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2024
### Motivation and Context

<!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo!
Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following
information:
  1. Why is this change required?
  2. What problem does it solve?
  3. What scenario does it contribute to?
  4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
-->
Previously when an AI client starts a model diagnostics activity, it
passes in an execution setting that is not parsed to a setting that is
specific to the client. This creates an issue where the some of the
settings cannot be read by the diagnostics module.

### Description

<!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design.
These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! -->

Pass in the parsed setting to the diagnostics module. The diagnostics
module will the serialize the object and deserialize it to
`PromptExecutionSettings` to get the extension data.


![image](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/assets/12570346/e64d5e70-94d2-4cad-ae34-aeb249f62f58)

### Contribution Checklist

<!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: -->

- [ ] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [ ] The PR follows the [SK Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
and the [pre-submission formatting
script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts)
raises no violations
- [ ] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
- [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kernel Issues or pull requests impacting the core kernel .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants