Skip to content

.Net: Remove experimental flags for stable items #11346

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

markwallace-microsoft
Copy link
Member

Motivation and Context

  1. Native-AOT
  2. OpenAI execution settings
  3. ITextSearch
  4. IChatHistoryReducer
  5. Some Misc. core/abstractions experimental flags that are over 60 days

Description

Contribution Checklist

@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft requested a review from a team as a code owner April 2, 2025 20:38
@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft added .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code kernel Issues or pull requests impacting the core kernel kernel.core labels Apr 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Remove experimental flags for stable items .Net: Remove experimental flags for stable items Apr 2, 2025
dmytrostruk
dmytrostruk previously approved these changes Apr 3, 2025
westey-m
westey-m previously approved these changes Apr 3, 2025
@RogerBarreto
Copy link
Member

RogerBarreto commented Apr 3, 2025

Suggest removing those too as this is supported natively by the OpenAI SDK.

RogerBarreto
RogerBarreto previously approved these changes Apr 3, 2025
Copy link
Member

@adamsitnik adamsitnik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 4, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Apr 4, 2025
@RogerBarreto
Copy link
Member

RogerBarreto commented Apr 4, 2025

I would recommend creating a second PR after this, removing any unused pragmas after this merges.

🚢it.

@markwallace-microsoft
Copy link
Member Author

Following integration test failed:

[xUnit.net 00:01:53.52]     SemanticKernel.IntegrationTests.Connectors.AzureOpenAI.AzureOpenAIChatCompletionNonStreamingTests.ChatCompletionShouldUseChatSystemPromptAsync [FAIL]
[xUnit.net 00:01:53.52]       Assert.Contains() Failure: Sub-string not found
[xUnit.net 00:01:53.53]       String:    "I don’t know."
[xUnit.net 00:01:53.53]       Not found: "I don't know"

@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit dc0a434 Apr 4, 2025
20 checks passed
@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft deleted the users/markwallace/remove_experimental_250402 branch April 4, 2025 11:27
glorious-beard pushed a commit to glorious-beard/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2025
### Motivation and Context

1. Native-AOT
2. OpenAI execution settings
3. ITextSearch
4. IChatHistoryReducer
5. Some Misc. core/abstractions experimental flags that are over 60 days

### Description

<!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design.
These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! -->

### Contribution Checklist

<!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: -->

- [ ] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [ ] The PR follows the [SK Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
and the [pre-submission formatting
script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts)
raises no violations
- [ ] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
- [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kernel.core kernel Issues or pull requests impacting the core kernel .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants