-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 549
Correct AuthorizationError field declarations for ES 2022 #24405
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
CraigMacomber
merged 4 commits into
microsoft:main
from
CraigMacomber:AuthorizationErrorEs2022
Apr 22, 2025
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e3c9718
Correct AuthorizationError field declarations for ES 2022
CraigMacomber c70489b
Update packages/loader/driver-utils/src/network.ts
CraigMacomber 6aec47c
Update packages/loader/driver-utils/src/network.ts
CraigMacomber dc56d7d
Update packages/loader/driver-utils/src/network.ts
CraigMacomber File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo - perhaps you mean to omit "own"
But might warrant some rewording. I think you mean to say that
readonly claims?: string
would override super class properties. It is hard to understand because now it saysdeclare ...
which does not have that behvior.Maybe something like:
When targeting ES 2022 or later, TypeScript generates ES6 class fields for properties listed without
declare
keyword and overrides the properties dynamically created by the super constructor.Or just leave it out and amend the following to say:
To prevent undesired overriding of super class properties (when targeting ES 2022 or later),
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I specifically mean "own properties" (the same "own properties" in APIs like "Object.getOwnPropertyNames").
I specifically mentioned this, since overriding inherited properties is much more common and easier, but not what is being done here.
How about:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that is more clear: Does that address your concerns?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The revision works. The difficulty is just English. "the own properties" looks like a "their own properties" because "their own" is an extremely common phrase. Putting "own" in quotes would have helped make it look intentional.