-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 549
Fix handling of deleted TreeNodes #24345
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
969c359
Fix cache lifetime and deleted node errors for nodes after view dispo…
CraigMacomber cd88269
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/microsoft/FluidFramework in…
CraigMacomber ad06564
Update packages/dds/tree/src/feature-libraries/flex-tree/flexTreeType…
CraigMacomber 7d6b81d
Add changeset
CraigMacomber 7df1166
Merge branch 'CleanupNodes' of https://github.com/CraigMacomber/Fluid…
CraigMacomber 0a43e31
Edit changeset
CraigMacomber 850d79b
Apply suggestions from code review
CraigMacomber 92fa6a0
Merge branch 'main' into CleanupNodes
CraigMacomber File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
--- | ||
"@fluidframework/tree": minor | ||
"fluid-framework": minor | ||
"__section": tree | ||
--- | ||
Improve handling of deleted nodes | ||
|
||
[TreeNodes](https://fluidframework.com/docs/api/fluid-framework/treenode-class) which are [deleted](https://fluidframework.com/docs/api/fluid-framework/treestatus-enum#deleted-enummember) were not handled correctly. | ||
This has been improved in two ways: | ||
|
||
1. Accessing fields of deleted nodes now consistently throws a usage error indicating that this is invalid. | ||
Previously this would throw an assertion error, which was a bug. | ||
2. When a `TreeNode` is deleted, but the node still exists within the [`ITree`](https://fluidframework.com/docs/api/driver-definitions/itree-interface), then becomes accessible again later, now a new `TreeNode` is allocated instead of trying to reuse the deleted one. | ||
Note that this can only happen when the entire view of the `ITree` is disposed then recreated. | ||
This happens when disposing and recreating a [TreeView](https://fluidframework.com/docs/api/fluid-framework/treeview-interface) or when the contents of the view are disposed due to being out of schema (another client did a schema upgrade), then brought back into schema (the schema upgrade was undone). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: unrelated to this PR, but should this function be renamed to
assertFlexTreeEntityNotDeleted
? The doc comment for the function also seems to sayAssert entity is not deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in the flex tree abstraction, we have isFreed which this is referring to, so I think its fine. Probably would be nice to better along the terminology in the two layers though.