Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions docs/source/index.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ torchtune tutorials.
recipes/recipes_overview
recipes/lora_finetune_single_device
recipes/qat_distributed
recipes/dpo

.. toctree::
:glob:
Expand Down
75 changes: 75 additions & 0 deletions docs/source/recipes/dpo.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
.. _dpo_recipe_label:

====================================
Direct Preference Optimization
====================================

This recipe supports several `Direct Preference Optimization <https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18290>`_ (DPO)-style fine-tuning techniques.
These techniques aim to steer (or `align <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_alignment>`_) a model towards some desirable behaviours.
For example, a common goal is to train language models to produce safe and honest outputs,
or to be `helpful and harmless <https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05862>`_.

To see the best results when using this recipe, it may be helpful to first fine-tune your model with using supervised fine-tuning to ensure your model is
on-distribution for the domain you're interested in. To do this, check out our other fine-tuning recipes in the :ref:`recipe overview <recipes_overview_label>` which
support a variety of SFT paradigms.

After supervised fine-tuning, here is an example of DPO with Llama 3.1 8B:

.. note::

You may need to be granted access to the Llama model you're interested in. See
:ref:`here <download_llama_label>` for details on accessing gated repositories.


.. code-block:: bash

tune download meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct \
--ignore-patterns "original/consolidated.00.pth"
--HF_TOKEN <HF_TOKEN>

# run on a single device
tune run lora_dpo_single_device --config llama3_1/8B_lora_dpo_single_device

# run on two gpus
tune run --nproc_per_node 2 lora_dpo_distributed --config llama3_1/8B_lora_dpo

It's easy to get started with this recipe with your dataset of choice, including custom local datasets,
and datasets from Hugging Face. Check out our primer on :ref:`preference datasets <preference_dataset_usage_label>` to
see how to do this.

For this recipe we include different DPO-style losses:

* :class:`Direct Preference Optimization <torchtune.rlhf.loss.DPOLoss>` (DPO) loss [#]_. The DPO loss function
increases the relative log-probabilities of preferred to un-preferred responses, whilst using log probabilities
from a reference model to prevent policy degradation during training. Alongside RLHF, this is the most commonly used
alignment technique and is used to train a growing number of state-of-the-art LLMs e.g. Llama3.1, Gemma 2, Qwen2, etc.
This is a good starting point for alignment fine-tuning.
* :class:`Statistical Rejection Sampling Optimization <torchtune.rlhf.loss.RSOLoss>` (RSO) or "hinge" loss [#]_.
RSO builds on concepts from support vector machines and DPO, applying a margin-based approach that penalizes
low-quality responses while ensuring a significant gap between chosen and un-chosen log probabilities.

To use any of these, simply use the ``loss`` config entry or flag through the :ref:`cli_label`:

.. code-block:: bash

tune run lora_dpo_single_device --config llama2/7B_lora_dpo_single_device \
loss=torchtune.modules.loss.RSOLoss \
gamma=0.5

.. todo (@SalmanMohammadi) point to an example repo for SimPO

For a deeper understanding of the different levers you can pull when using this recipe,
see our documentation for the different PEFT training paradigms we support:

* :ref:`glossary_lora`
* :ref:`glossary_qlora`
* :ref:`glossary_dora`

Many of our other memory optimization features can be used in this recipe. You can learn more about all of our memory optimization features in our :ref:`memory optimization overview<memory_optimization_overview_label>`.

.. rubric:: References:

.. [#] Rafailov, R., Sharma, A., Mitchell, E., Manning, C.D., Ermon, S. and Finn, C., 2024.
Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
.. [#] Liu, T., Zhao, Y., Joshi, R., Khalman, M., Saleh, M., Liu, P.J. and Liu, J., 2023.
Statistical rejection sampling improves preference optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06657.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/source/recipes/lora_finetune_single_device.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ This recipe supports finetuning on next-token prediction tasks using parameter e
such as :ref:`glossary_lora` and :ref:`glossary_qlora`. These techniques
significantly reduce memory consumption during training whilst still maintaining competitive performance.

We provide configs which you can get up and running quickly. Here is an example with llama 3.1 8B:
We provide configs which you can get up and running quickly. Here is an example with Llama 3.1 8B:

.. note::

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/source/recipes/recipes_overview.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Our recipes include:
* Single-device full fine-tuning
* Distributed full fine-tuning
* Distributed LoRA fine-tuning
* Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)
* :ref:`Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) <dpo_recipe_label>`
* Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
* :ref:`Distributed Quantization-Aware Training (QAT)<qat_distributed_recipe_label>`.

Expand Down