Skip to content

AI-Aided: Fix table width issue on important upgrade notes page #8080

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 20, 2025

Conversation

svelle
Copy link
Member

@svelle svelle commented Jun 18, 2025

Fixes the issue where the important upgrade notes table has content that is wider than it's width.

The css should only affect the table on the important upgrade notes table and leave all other tables untouched.

Before:

image

After:

image

Fixed horizontal scrolling problem by implementing page-specific responsive table styling that only affects the upgrade notes table while preserving existing behavior for all other documentation tables.

Key improvements:
- Responsive table layout with 25%/75% column proportions
- Page-specific CSS targeting using section#important-upgrade-notes
- Proper word wrapping and vertical alignment for long content
- Unified styling for both table headers (th) and data cells (td)
- Eliminates horizontal scrollbar while maintaining readability

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@svelle svelle requested review from Copilot and cwarnermm June 18, 2025 18:12
@cwarnermm cwarnermm added the 2: Editor Review Requires review by an editor label Jun 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR scopes responsive table styles to the important upgrade notes page, ensuring the upgrade notes table wraps content and fits its container without affecting other tables.

  • Adds scoped CSS overrides for tables under section#important-upgrade-notes
  • Enables fixed table layout with word-breaking on cells and headers
  • Sets explicit width percentages for first and last columns

Comment on lines +338 to +353
width: 100% !important;
table-layout: fixed !important;
overflow-wrap: break-word !important;
min-width: unset !important;
}

section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default td,
section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default th {
word-wrap: break-word !important;
vertical-align: top !important;
min-width: unset !important;
}

section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default td:first-child,
section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default th:first-child {
width: 25% !important;
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jun 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Avoid using !important where possible. Instead, increase selector specificity or place this rule after the default table styles to override them without !important.

Suggested change
width: 100% !important;
table-layout: fixed !important;
overflow-wrap: break-word !important;
min-width: unset !important;
}
section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default td,
section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default th {
word-wrap: break-word !important;
vertical-align: top !important;
min-width: unset !important;
}
section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default td:first-child,
section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default th:first-child {
width: 25% !important;
width: 100%;
table-layout: fixed;
overflow-wrap: break-word;
min-width: unset;
}
section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default td,
section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default th {
word-wrap: break-word;
vertical-align: top;
min-width: unset;
}
section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default td:first-child,
section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default th:first-child {
width: 25%;

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

min-width: unset !important;
}

section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default td,
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jun 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can combine the td and th selectors into one rule block to reduce repetition, e.g. section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default th, td { … }.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link

Newest code from mattermost has been published to preview environment for Git SHA 9ac17c3

@svelle
Copy link
Member Author

svelle commented Jun 18, 2025

@svelle
Copy link
Member Author

svelle commented Jun 18, 2025

@claude review this pr, review copilots comments and consider if they're useful or not.

Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Claude finished @svelle's task —— View job


PR Review - Important Upgrade Notes Table Fix

Tasks:

  • Read the modified CSS file to understand the implementation
  • Analyze the CSS changes for correctness and best practices
  • Evaluate copilot's review suggestions for usefulness
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Analysis of CSS Changes:

The implementation properly addresses the table width issue by:

  1. Good scoping: Uses specific selector section#important-upgrade-notes table.align-default to avoid affecting other tables
  2. Effective solution: Combines table-layout: fixed, width: 100%, and word-breaking properties to ensure content wraps within container
  3. Visual improvement: Before/after images show the fix eliminates horizontal overflow and makes content readable

Evaluation of Copilot's Suggestions:

1. Avoiding !important (Comment on line 353)

  • Verdict: Not useful in this case
  • Reasoning: The !important declarations are necessary here because this CSS needs to override existing table styles that likely have higher specificity. The scoped selector alone may not be sufficient to override existing styles without !important.

2. Combining td and th selectors (Comment on line 344)

  • Verdict: Marginally useful for code organization
  • Reasoning: While combining selectors reduces repetition, the current approach is clear and explicit. The minor benefit doesn't justify requiring changes for this specific fix.

3. Using CSS Grid instead of fixed percentages (Comment on line 358)

  • Verdict: Not useful for this context
  • Reasoning:
    • The author correctly noted that column count won't change
    • CSS Grid would be overkill for a simple 2-column table
    • Fixed percentages (25%/75%) are appropriate and maintainable for this use case
    • Grid layout would require more complex CSS and testing

Final Assessment:

Approve: The PR effectively solves the stated problem with a targeted, minimal solution. The approach is appropriate for the specific use case, and the copilot's suggestions, while technically valid in some contexts, are not necessary improvements for this particular fix.

Key strengths:

  • Well-scoped CSS that won't affect other tables
  • Addresses the core issue (table width overflow) effectively
  • Includes appropriate word-breaking and layout fixes
  • Clean, readable implementation

No changes recommended - the current implementation is solid for its purpose.


Copy link
Member

@cwarnermm cwarnermm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @svelle!

@cwarnermm cwarnermm merged commit 460deaf into master Jun 20, 2025
5 checks passed
@cwarnermm cwarnermm deleted the fix-important-upgrade-notes-table branch June 20, 2025 20:40
@cwarnermm cwarnermm changed the title Fix table width issue on important upgrade notes page AI-Aided: Fix table width issue on important upgrade notes page Jun 20, 2025
@cwarnermm cwarnermm added 3: Reviews Complete All reviewers have approved the pull request and removed 2: Editor Review Requires review by an editor labels Jun 20, 2025
Copy link

Newest code from mattermost has been published to preview environment for Git SHA 6e4e6e5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3: Reviews Complete All reviewers have approved the pull request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants