Adding tests to verify cloud patterns

[jm9176]

Added positive testpoint as discussed offline. The negative test was already as part of a separate testpoint, so I am not adding anything new to verify the error.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.72%. Comparing base (c2f9646) to head (bd8bb33).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #107   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.72%   96.72%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         214      214           
=======================================
  Hits          207      207           
  Misses          7        7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[krisfed]

LGTM! thank you, Shubh!

[krisfed]

curious - why cell array of char vectors instead of a more modern array of strings?

[jm9176]

Nothing specific.

[krisfed]

Very minor and somewhat subjective, but you can use a for-each loop if you don't need the index i for anything else other than getting the current path

paths = ["path1", "path2", "path3"]; % has to be a row vector
for p = paths % iterate over the array of strings directly instead of using index
disp(p)
end

That way you don't have to keep doing {i} to access the current path. Alternatively, can save the current path to a separate variable first currPath = inpPath{i}.

[jm9176]

Thanks, but keeping it as is for now, for better readability.