docs: update git ref #2
Conversation
WalkthroughThe copyright year in the LICENSE was updated from 2024 to 2025. The README was refined to specify the repository’s role as a child module for managing Postgres Logical Databases, Users, and Roles, including an updated module source URL and a link to child module documentation. The GitHub Actions workflow was simplified by replacing multiple manual steps with a single composite action for Terraform testing. Changes
Poem
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
README.md (2)
3-3: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate repository name in the title heading.
The H1 still reads# terraform-postgres-automationbut the module source and repo have been renamed toterraform-postgres-config-dbs-users-roles. Please update the title to match for consistency.
263-268: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate badges and links to new repository.
The release badge, latest‐release, contributors, and issues URLs still point toterraform-postgres-automation. Please update them toterraform-postgres-config-dbs-users-rolesso they resolve correctly.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
18-18: Fix typo in prerequisites section.
The word “specifiic” is misspelled; it should be “specific.”
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
LICENSE(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
LICENSE (1)
190-190: Approve year update in LICENSE.
The copyright year has been correctly updated from 2024 to 2025, aligning with the repository maintenance.README.md (1)
36-36: Approve module source reference update.
The modulesourceURL correctly points toterraform-postgres-config-dbs-users-roles.git?ref=main.
|
@masterpointio/masterpoint-open-source can I get a pull request review. I changed the github repo name/url so I could get a better terraform registry url, https://registry.terraform.io/modules/masterpointio/config-dbs-users-roles/postgres/latest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yaml (1)
24-24: Pin composite action by version tag rather than commit hash
To make upgrades clearer and align with semver, consider using the tag directly:- uses: masterpointio/github-action-tf-test@c3b619f3bca9e4f482b9e0fb3166ab3f02d9d54c # v1.0.0 + uses: masterpointio/github-action-tf-test@v1.0.0
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/test.yaml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/test.yaml (4)
18-18: Looks good: dynamic job naming with emoji
Using${{ matrix.tf }}in the job name, along with an emoji, enhances readability in the GitHub Actions UI.
26-26: Approve: matrix-driventf_typeinput
Mappingtf_typefrom the matrix ensures both test variants run as expected.
27-27: Clarify source and scope ofaws_role_arn
You’re pulling the AWS role ARN fromvars. EnsureTF_TEST_AWS_ROLE_ARNis defined at the repository or environment level. If this ARN grants elevated permissions, consider moving it tosecretsfor stricter access control.
28-28: Approve: usingsecrets.GITHUB_TOKEN
Leveraging the built-inGITHUB_TOKENis the recommended approach for granting Actions minimal necessary permissions.
.github/workflows/test.yaml
Outdated
| @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ on: | |||
| push: | |||
| branches: | |||
| - main | |||
| pull_request: | |||
| pull_request_target: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Potential security risk: pull_request_target exposes elevated permissions to untrusted code
Using pull_request_target causes workflows to run with write permissions in the context of the base branch, which can be exploited by malicious PRs from forks. Consider switching back to pull_request or adding an if guard on the job to only run when the PR originates from the same repository.
Example mitigation:
jobs:
tf-test:
+ if: github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository
name: 🧪 ${{ matrix.tf }} test
runs-on: ubuntu-latest📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| pull_request_target: | |
| jobs: | |
| tf-test: | |
| if: github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository | |
| name: 🧪 ${{ matrix.tf }} test | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/test.yaml at line 7, the use of pull_request_target poses a
security risk by granting elevated permissions to untrusted code from forked
PRs. To fix this, replace pull_request_target with pull_request to limit
permissions, or add a conditional check in the job to ensure it only runs when
the PR originates from the same repository, preventing execution of potentially
malicious code from forks.
|
@Gowiem I resolved the issues with tests not running. Can I get another review? |
pre-merge todos
what
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores