Skip to content

Conversation

@gberenice
Copy link
Member

@gberenice gberenice commented Aug 21, 2025

what

  • Replace trunk-upgrade script with the reusable workflow.
  • Remove @masterpoint-team from reviewers, as it's already in the group.
  • Fix typo in gitignore.

why

  • Less tedious management.

references

  • N/A

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated repository code ownership to the open-source maintainers group.
    • Streamlined the automated upgrade workflow into a single action for improved reliability and reduced maintenance overhead.
    • Standardized ignore patterns to consistently exclude temporary files across the project.

@gberenice gberenice requested review from a team and masterpoint-team as code owners August 21, 2025 13:01
@gberenice gberenice merged commit 9ef513a into main Aug 21, 2025
5 checks passed
@gberenice gberenice deleted the chore/recent-improvements branch August 21, 2025 13:05
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 21, 2025

Walkthrough

  • .github/CODEOWNERS: Removed @masterpoint-team from the default owners, leaving @masterpointio/masterpoint-open-source as the sole default owner.
  • .github/workflows/trunk-upgrade.yaml: Replaced the previous multi-step Trunk upgrade flow with a single step using masterpointio/github-action-trunk-upgrade@v0.1.0. Updated inputs (app-id, app-private-key, github-token), changed reviewers to @masterpointio/masterpoint-open-source, and removed prior token creation and merge/wait steps.
  • .gitignore: Standardized the tmp file ignore pattern from */.tmp to **/.tmp.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Gowiem
  • oycyc

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/recent-improvements

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.gitignore (1)

43-43: Good fix on recursive tmp glob; consider a tiny hardening

Switching from "/.tmp" to "/*.tmp" uses the correct Git ignore semantics for recursive matching. Optionally, add a root-level pattern for maximal compatibility with tools that may not treat "**" as matching zero directories.

 **/*.backup
 **/*.tmp
+*.tmp
 **/*.temp
.github/workflows/trunk-upgrade.yaml (1)

23-23: Pin the action to a commit SHA for supply-chain safety

Tags can be retagged; pinning the action to a specific commit SHA is a common hardening step (you already do this for actions/checkout).

-        uses: masterpointio/github-action-trunk-upgrade@v0.1.0
+        uses: masterpointio/github-action-trunk-upgrade@<commit-sha>
+# Replace <commit-sha> with the exact commit for v0.1.0 and keep a comment with the version for readability.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3aa7fd9 and 02251e0.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/trunk-upgrade.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/trunk-upgrade.yaml (2)

28-28: Reviewers alignment with CODEOWNERS is clean

Setting reviewers to @masterpointio/masterpoint-open-source matches the updated CODEOWNERS and reduces duplication. Nice consistency.


25-27: Verify secrets configuration and reduce PAT usage

I attempted to list the repository- and organization-level secrets but received HTTP 403 errors due to insufficient permissions. Please manually confirm the following:

  • The secrets MP_BOT_APP_ID and MP_BOT_APP_PRIVATE_KEY are present at the repo or org level and accessible by this workflow.
  • The MASTERPOINT_TEAM_PAT secret exists only if strictly necessary, and is configured as a fine-grained, repository-scoped PAT.

Best practice: prefer using the GitHub App installation token (via your App ID and private key) instead of a long-lived PAT to minimize blast radius. If a PAT is required for specific endpoints, ensure it’s scoped with the narrowest permissions possible.


# These owners will be the default owners for everything
* @masterpointio/masterpoint-open-source @masterpoint-team
* @masterpointio/masterpoint-open-source
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

❓ Verification inconclusive

Default owners simplification looks right; please verify team slug and access

Removing a redundant team entry reduces noise. Confirm that @masterpointio/masterpoint-open-source is an org team with repo access, so CODEOWNERS can request reviews successfully.

You can verify with GitHub CLI:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

ORG="masterpointio"
TEAM_SLUG="masterpoint-open-source"
REPO="masterpointio/terraform-module-template"

# 1) Team exists
gh api /orgs/$ORG/teams/$TEAM_SLUG >/dev/null && echo "Team exists: $ORG/$TEAM_SLUG"

# 2) Team has repo access (any level)
gh api /orgs/$ORG/teams/$TEAM_SLUG/repos/$REPO >/dev/null && echo "Team has access to $REPO"

Length of output: 336


Fix invalid team slug in CODEOWNERS

Our verification script returned 404 errors when checking both the team’s existence and its repo access, which means the entry in your .github/CODEOWNERS file will not work as-is:

  • File: .github/CODEOWNERS
    Line: 7
    Entry:
    - *             @masterpointio/masterpoint-open-source

Please address this critical issue:

  • Confirm the exact GitHub team slug (it may differ from masterpoint-open-source).
  • If the team doesn’t exist yet, create it under masterpointio and grant it access to masterpointio/terraform-module-template.
  • Update the CODEOWNERS entry with the correct slug once established, for example:
    - *             @masterpointio/masterpoint-open-source
    + *             @masterpointio/<correct-team-slug>

Until this is fixed, CODEOWNERS reviews cannot be requested as intended.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/CODEOWNERS around line 7: the team slug
"@masterpointio/masterpoint-open-source" is invalid and caused 404s; verify the
correct GitHub team slug under the masterpointio org (it may differ), or if the
team does not exist create the team under masterpointio, grant it access to the
masterpointio/terraform-module-template repo (with required permission level),
then update the CODEOWNERS entry on line 7 to use the exact confirmed slug
(e.g., @masterpointio/<correct-slug>) so CODEOWNERS resolution succeeds.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant