Skip to content

chore: minor recent findings #36

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2025
Merged

chore: minor recent findings #36

merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2025

Conversation

gberenice
Copy link
Member

@gberenice gberenice commented May 14, 2025

what

  • Adds conventional title lint check.
  • Update the year in the License.

why

  • Housekeeping.

references

  • INT-66

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced workflow to prevent overlapping lint runs and enforce semantic pull request titles.
    • Updated license to reflect the year 2025.

@gberenice gberenice requested a review from a team as a code owner May 14, 2025 09:36
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The updates introduce concurrency control to the GitHub Actions lint workflow by grouping runs based on branch name or run ID and canceling any overlapping in-progress runs. A new job named "conventional-title" is added to the workflow, utilizing the "amannn/action-semantic-pull-request" action to enforce semantic pull request titles. Additionally, the LICENSE file is updated to reflect the year 2025, with no other changes to its content.

Suggested reviewers

  • oycyc

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
  • CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/lint.yaml (1)

24-29: Introduce semantic PR title enforcement
The conventional-title job properly invokes the semantic PR title check action. For clarity and faster feedback, you may consider:

  • Adding a name: Check PR title to the step.
  • Setting needs: conventional-title on the lint job so linting only runs if the title passes.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d3428d and 583ac74.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yaml (2 hunks)
  • LICENSE (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
LICENSE (1)

190-190: Update license year to current year
Great catch updating the copyright statement to 2025—this keeps our LICENSE accurate.

.github/workflows/lint.yaml (1)

3-5: Prevent overlapping lint runs with concurrency control
The new concurrency block is correctly set up to group by branch or run ID and cancel in-progress runs. This will save CI resources and avoid redundant checks.

Copy link
Member

@westonplatter westonplatter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@gberenice gberenice merged commit d4bb431 into main May 15, 2025
5 checks passed
@gberenice gberenice deleted the chore/int-66/more-findings branch May 15, 2025 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants