fix: executed sync operation

[westonplatter]

what

Executed the task it sync process,

cd clients/masterpointio
cd taskit
task os:sync-all -- terraform-googleworkspace-users-groups-automation
cd ../terraform-googleworkspace-users-groups-automation
git commit -m "fix: ran task os:sync-all -- terraform-googleworkspace-users-groups-automation"
git push

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Improved workflow efficiency by preventing overlapping lint jobs for the same branch.
  • Enforced semantic pull request titles for better consistency.
  • Updated workflow triggers to enhance security for pull request events.
  • Updated the copyright year in the license to 2025.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The lint workflow configuration was updated to include concurrency control, ensuring that only one lint job runs per branch or run by grouping and canceling overlapping jobs. A new job, conventional-title, was added to enforce semantic pull request titles using a GitHub Action. In the test workflow, the trigger event was changed from pull_request to pull_request_target, altering the context in which the workflow executes. Additionally, the copyright year in the license file was updated from 2024 to 2025. No other substantive changes were made.

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.

---

Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 30th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

.github/workflows/lint.yaml (2)

3-6: Refine concurrency group for push events
Using ${{ github.head_ref || github.run_id }} means push events (where head_ref is empty) will fall back to a unique run_id, so concurrent pushes on main won’t cancel each other. If you’d like to de-duplicate both PR and push runs, consider grouping by github.ref_name or including github.event_name:

 concurrency:
-  group: lint-${{ github.head_ref || github.run_id }}
+  group: lint-${{ github.event_name }}-${{ github.ref_name || github.run_id }}
   cancel-in-progress: true

---

24-30: Gate lint job on semantic-title validation
The new conventional-title job runs in parallel with lint, so a title failure won’t block your lint checks. If you want to enforce PR title compliance first, add a dependency:

 jobs:
   conventional-title:
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
     steps:
       - uses: amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@0723387faaf9b38adef4775cd42cfd5155ed6017
         env:
           GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

-  lint:
+  lint:
+    needs: [conventional-title]
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
     steps:
       - name: Check out Git repository

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff80ced and 9060886.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• .github/workflows/lint.yaml (2 hunks)
• .github/workflows/test.yaml (1 hunks)
• LICENSE (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

LICENSE (1)

190-190: Confirm copyright year bump
The year has been correctly updated to 2025. Please verify that any other license headers or NOTICE files in the repository have been updated to match.

[gberenice]

Glad it worked out!
There is a task os:push to push those changes as well. I separated it from the sync step for now, since we can’t always guarantee the diff is valid for certain files (like the aqua config). I’m planning to automate the sync on a schedule soon.

[westonplatter]

Glad it worked out! There is a task os:push to push those changes as well. I separated it from the sync step for now, since we can’t always guarantee the diff is valid for certain files (like the aqua config). I’m planning to automate the sync on a schedule soon.

Oh, sweet. I'll plan to use the os:push going forward.