chore: sync with template #60
Conversation
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow file, Possibly related PRs
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 30th. To opt out, configure Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/notion-sync.yaml (3)
6-20: Evaluate trigger scope to reduce noiseThis workflow triggers on a broad set of issue events, which could lead to high run frequency. Consider narrowing the event types to just those you need, or adding conditional filters to debounce events that don’t affect your Notion sync. For instance, if labels or edits don’t matter, you could limit to
opened,reopened, andclosed.
21-24: Add concurrency for idempotent runsWithout a
concurrencysetting, rapid successive events may spawn overlapping jobs. Consider adding:concurrency: group: notion-sync cancel-in-progress: trueto ensure only one run per group is active at a time.
25-27: Pin action version for maintainabilityUsing a commit SHA ensures reproducibility, but you might opt for a semantic version tag (e.g.,
@v1) and enable Dependabot to automate minor/patch updates. This balances stability with easier upgrades.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/notion-sync.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/notion-sync.yaml (3)
1-2: Workflow naming clarityThe
name: Notion Syncis concise and descriptive, making it easy to identify in the Actions UI.
3-5: Principle of least privilege appliedRestricting
issues: readaligns with least-privilege security practices, ensuring the workflow only has the access it needs.
28-30:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify required repository secrets
This step relies on
GH_ISSUES_NOTION_TOKENandGH_ISSUES_DB_ID. Run the following to confirm they exist:Ensure both appear in the output to avoid workflow failures.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/usr/bin/env bash # Verify required GitHub repository secrets gh secret list | grep -E 'GH_ISSUES_NOTION_TOKEN|GH_ISSUES_DB_ID' || { echo "One or more required secrets are missing"; exit 1; } echo "All required secrets are present"Length of output: 256
Verify repository secrets for Notion integration
This workflow step uses two repository secrets:
with: notion-token: ${{ secrets.GH_ISSUES_NOTION_TOKEN }} notion-db: ${{ secrets.GH_ISSUES_DB_ID }}Please confirm both are defined under your repo’s Settings > Secrets and variables > Actions to prevent workflow failures:
- GH_ISSUES_NOTION_TOKEN
- GH_ISSUES_DB_ID
what