Skip to content

Changes for managarm cancelable syscalls #884

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 23, 2025

Conversation

Geertiebear
Copy link
Member

Since the changes are incomplete and a little unstable, marking it as draft right now.

@Geertiebear
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah there are quite some debug logs left currently 😅

Copy link
Member

@ElectrodeYT ElectrodeYT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

I do have a question, since this is not instantly obvious to me: would this code work without the changes in managarm, or are we looking at circular dependencies here? To my knowledge, merging in the managarm side first would result in some weird behavior.

@Geertiebear Geertiebear marked this pull request as ready for review December 24, 2024 14:47
@no92 no92 force-pushed the cancelable_syscalls branch 2 times, most recently from a0a4f8a to 1cf7659 Compare July 10, 2025 16:07
@no92 no92 force-pushed the cancelable_syscalls branch 2 times, most recently from ced6afb to 7b03c71 Compare July 14, 2025 22:43
@no92 no92 force-pushed the cancelable_syscalls branch 2 times, most recently from ef9f783 to 6bd9452 Compare July 23, 2025 13:50
@no92 no92 force-pushed the cancelable_syscalls branch from 6bd9452 to 078e61e Compare July 23, 2025 13:53
@no92 no92 added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into managarm:master with commit 577eef2 Jul 23, 2025
81 of 86 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants