-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
feat: add cli log level #1864
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kedevked
wants to merge
2
commits into
lynx-family:main
Choose a base branch
from
kedevked:feature/add-cli-log-level
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+21
−0
Open
feat: add cli log level #1864
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
🧩 Analysis chain
Add validation for log level values.
Commander.js will accept any string for
--log-level, but only'info' | 'warn' | 'error' | 'silent'are valid. Without validation, invalid values will be silently passed through, potentially causing runtime errors.Apply this diff to add validation using Commander's
.choices():.option( '--log-level <level>', 'Set the log level (info | warn | error | silent)', ) + .addOption( + new Option('--log-level <level>', 'Set the log level') + .choices(['info', 'warn', 'error', 'silent']) + )Note: You'll need to import
Optionfromcommander:import type { Command } from 'commander' +import { Option } from 'commander'Run the following script to verify that all command implementations (build, dev, preview) consume the logLevel option consistently:
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 1035
Add validation for
--log-levelvia Commander.js.choices()Restrict allowed values to
info | warn | error | silentby replacing the loose.option()call. For example:import type { Command } from 'commander' +import { Option } from 'commander' command - .option( - '--log-level <level>', - 'Set the log level (info | warn | error | silent)', - ) + .addOption( + new Option('--log-level <level>', 'Set the log level') + .choices(['info', 'warn', 'error', 'silent']), + )All commands (build, dev, preview, inspect) already read
logLeveland setlogger.level.📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents