-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
[DebugInfo][NewGVN] Fix debug value loss #147634
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[DebugInfo][NewGVN] Fix debug value loss #147634
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms @llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo Author: Shan Huang (Apochens) ChangesFix #147511 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147634.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
index 7eeaaa0d99602..f101d3c126491 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
@@ -4076,6 +4076,7 @@ bool NewGVN::eliminateInstructions(Function &F) {
if (!match(DefI, m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::ssa_copy>()))
patchReplacementInstruction(DefI, DominatingLeader);
+ salvageDebugInfo(*DefI);
markInstructionForDeletion(DefI);
}
}
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/NewGVN/salvage-eliminate-instruction.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/NewGVN/salvage-eliminate-instruction.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..fe26cefb2803e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/NewGVN/salvage-eliminate-instruction.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+; RUN: opt -S -passes=newgvn %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Check that eliminateInstruction() salvages the debug value of `Def` (`DefI`)
+; which is marked for deletion.
+
+
+define void @binop(i32 %x, i32 %y) !dbg !5 {
+; CHECK: #dbg_value(!DIArgList(i32 %y, i32 %x), [[META11:![0-9]+]], !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0, DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 1, DW_OP_plus, DW_OP_stack_value), [[META13:![0-9]+]])
+;
+ %add1 = add i32 %x, %y, !dbg !12
+ #dbg_value(i32 %add1, !9, !DIExpression(), !12)
+ %add2 = add i32 %y, %x, !dbg !13
+ #dbg_value(i32 %add2, !11, !DIExpression(), !13)
+ call void @use(i32 %add1, i32 %add2), !dbg !14
+ ret void, !dbg !15
+}
+
+declare void @use(i32, i32)
+
+!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0}
+!llvm.debugify = !{!2, !3}
+!llvm.module.flags = !{!4}
+
+!0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C, file: !1, producer: "debugify", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug)
+!1 = !DIFile(filename: "/app/example.ll", directory: "/")
+!2 = !{i32 4}
+!3 = !{i32 2}
+!4 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
+!5 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "binop", linkageName: "binop", scope: null, file: !1, line: 1, type: !6, scopeLine: 1, spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition | DISPFlagOptimized, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !8)
+!6 = !DISubroutineType(types: !7)
+!7 = !{}
+!8 = !{!9, !11}
+!9 = !DILocalVariable(name: "1", scope: !5, file: !1, line: 1, type: !10)
+!10 = !DIBasicType(name: "ty32", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_unsigned)
+!11 = !DILocalVariable(name: "2", scope: !5, file: !1, line: 2, type: !10)
+!12 = !DILocation(line: 1, column: 1, scope: !5)
+!13 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 1, scope: !5)
+!14 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 1, scope: !5)
+!15 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 1, scope: !5)
+;.
+; CHECK: [[META11]] = !DILocalVariable(name: "2",
+; CHECK: [[META13]] = !DILocation(line: 2,
+;.
|
@@ -4076,6 +4076,7 @@ bool NewGVN::eliminateInstructions(Function &F) { | |||
if (!match(DefI, m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::ssa_copy>())) | |||
patchReplacementInstruction(DefI, DominatingLeader); | |||
|
|||
salvageDebugInfo(*DefI); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be moved inside the loop
for (Instruction *ToErase : InstructionsToErase) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be a solution, but that would introduce some unnecessary computation overhead of salvaging. For example, salvaging the store instructions in InstructionsToErase
is unnecessary:
llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
Lines 4194 to 4196 in 6c8c836
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Marking dead store " << *Member | |
<< " that is dominated by " << *Leader << "\n"); | |
markInstructionForDeletion(Member); |
So, I didn't place this salvage into the loop but place it just before where the salvageable instructions are marked for deletion. But if this unnecessary compulation is acceptable, I can move this salvage into the loop.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you. I'm fine with the current version if extra salvaging calls are redundant.
Fix #147511