-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
[KeyInstrs] Disable key-instructions for coroutine scopes #147551
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jmorse
wants to merge
1
commit into
llvm:main
Choose a base branch
from
jmorse:key-instrs-no-coroutines
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
81 changes: 81 additions & 0 deletions
81
clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/coro-dwarf-key-instrs.cpp
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ | ||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-optzns -std=c++20 \ | ||
// RUN: -triple=x86_64 -dwarf-version=4 -debug-info-kind=limited \ | ||
// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - %s -gkey-instructions | \ | ||
// RUN: FileCheck %s | ||
|
||
// Check that for the coroutine below, we mark the created DISubprogram as | ||
// not having key instructions. This will prevent AsmPrinter from trying to | ||
// instrument the linetable with key-instructions for source-locations in | ||
// the coroutine scope. | ||
// | ||
// This is a temporary workaround for key instructions: we can instrument | ||
// coroutine code in the future, but it hasn't been done yet. | ||
// | ||
// File contents copied from coro-dwarf.cpp. | ||
|
||
namespace std { | ||
template <typename... T> struct coroutine_traits; | ||
|
||
template <class Promise = void> struct coroutine_handle { | ||
coroutine_handle() = default; | ||
static coroutine_handle from_address(void *) noexcept; | ||
}; | ||
template <> struct coroutine_handle<void> { | ||
static coroutine_handle from_address(void *) noexcept; | ||
coroutine_handle() = default; | ||
template <class PromiseType> | ||
coroutine_handle(coroutine_handle<PromiseType>) noexcept; | ||
}; | ||
} // namespace std | ||
|
||
struct suspend_always { | ||
bool await_ready() noexcept; | ||
void await_suspend(std::coroutine_handle<>) noexcept; | ||
void await_resume() noexcept; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
template <typename... Args> struct std::coroutine_traits<void, Args...> { | ||
struct promise_type { | ||
void get_return_object() noexcept; | ||
suspend_always initial_suspend() noexcept; | ||
suspend_always final_suspend() noexcept; | ||
void return_void() noexcept; | ||
promise_type(); | ||
~promise_type() noexcept; | ||
void unhandled_exception() noexcept; | ||
}; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
// TODO: Not supported yet | ||
struct CopyOnly { | ||
int val; | ||
CopyOnly(const CopyOnly &) noexcept; | ||
CopyOnly(CopyOnly &&) = delete; | ||
~CopyOnly(); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
struct MoveOnly { | ||
int val; | ||
MoveOnly(const MoveOnly &) = delete; | ||
MoveOnly(MoveOnly &&) noexcept; | ||
~MoveOnly(); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
struct MoveAndCopy { | ||
int val; | ||
MoveAndCopy(const MoveAndCopy &) noexcept; | ||
MoveAndCopy(MoveAndCopy &&) noexcept; | ||
~MoveAndCopy(); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
void consume(int, int, int) noexcept; | ||
|
||
void f_coro(int val, MoveOnly moParam, MoveAndCopy mcParam) { | ||
consume(val, moParam.val, mcParam.val); | ||
co_return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// CHECK: ![[SP:[0-9]+]] = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f_coro", linkageName: "_Z6f_coroi8MoveOnly11MoveAndCopy" | ||
// CHECK-NOT: keyInstructions: | ||
// CHECK: !DIFil | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the reason for creating this as a new file rather than adding this as a new check in the existing file - is it just to keep the test confined to the
KeyInstructions
test dir?