-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
[clang][Sema] Declare builtins used in #pragma intrinsic #138205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
#ifdef USE_PRAGMA_BEFORE | ||
#pragma intrinsic(_InterlockedOr64) | ||
#endif | ||
|
||
#define MACRO(x,y) _InterlockedOr64(x,y); | ||
|
||
#ifdef USE_PRAGMA_AFTER | ||
#pragma intrinsic(_InterlockedOr64) | ||
#endif |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | ||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-extensions -fsyntax-only -verify -triple arm64-windows -isystem %S/Inputs %s -DUSE_PRAGMA_BEFORE | ||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-extensions -fsyntax-only -verify -triple arm64-windows -isystem %S/Inputs %s -DUSE_PRAGMA_AFTER | ||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-extensions -fsyntax-only -verify -triple arm64-windows -isystem %S/Inputs %s -DUSE_PRAGMA_AFTER_USE | ||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-extensions -fsyntax-only -verify -triple arm64-windows -isystem %S/Inputs %s -DUSE_PRAGMA_SAME_FILE | ||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-extensions -fsyntax-only -verify -triple arm64-windows -isystem %S/Inputs %s | ||
|
||
#if defined(USE_PRAGMA_BEFORE) || defined(USE_PRAGMA_AFTER) || defined(USE_PRAGMA_SAME_FILE) | ||
// expected-no-diagnostics | ||
#else | ||
// expected-error@+10 {{call to undeclared library function '_InterlockedOr64'}} | ||
// expected-note@+9 {{include the header <intrin.h> or explicitly provide a declaration for '_InterlockedOr64'}} | ||
#endif | ||
#include <builtin-system-header.h> | ||
|
||
#ifdef USE_PRAGMA_SAME_FILE | ||
#pragma intrinsic(_InterlockedOr64) | ||
#endif | ||
|
||
void foo() { | ||
MACRO(0,0); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#ifdef USE_PRAGMA_AFTER_USE | ||
#pragma intrinsic(_InterlockedOr64) | ||
#endif |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DenseMap of SmallVector values is not an efficient data structure choice, because the DenseMap is always at least 25% empty, and each SmallVector is likely to contain exactly 1 element.
I think we need to serialize these pragmas through the AST. Is it possible to do this by creating an implicit declaration of the builtin at the point of the pragma? You would test for this by making your system header into a module or PCH file in another test case.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I intended to write a comment explaining this commit but I got distracted and you reviewed it too fast :)
I tried creating the declaration just by calling
LazilyCreateBuiltin
in the pragma handler, but that caused problems when there is a declaration in the header because then we have two real declarations so we get a ambiguous call error. The reason that doesn't happen today with no changes is because we only callLazilyCreateBuiltin
when the lookup fails, as in when there is no header providing a declaration and the symbol is totally unknown.Let me try your idea, thanks for the feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried compiling the system header into a PCH and dumping the AST with
llvm-bcanalyzer
and I didn't see any implicit declarations, not sure if I was checking for the right thing.Either way, I tried another solution where we declare the builtin if it wasn't already declared. Fixes the ambiguous call errors I saw when trying to universally declare it and fixes the original issue. Please take a look when you have a sec, thanks.