support for multiple addressBlock nodes in a peripheral node. #10
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
THanks a lot, I'll try to review it in the next 2 days |
|
Work like charm. Tested it on Spansion FM3 MB9BF32xM.svd. Thanks @Buttje |
austinc3030
added a commit
to dynacylabs/ghidra-svd-loader
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
I put some effort into supporting multiple addresssBlock nodes inside a peripheral node.
As a matter of fact I had SVDs that do this and the schema also says that a peripheral is allowed to have 'one to many ' addressBlocks.
Hope you like it.
Kr,
Lutz