Skip to content

add: SIG-Scheduling annual report #8288

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 8, 2025
Merged

add: SIG-Scheduling annual report #8288

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 8, 2025

Conversation

sanposhiho
Copy link
Member

@sanposhiho sanposhiho commented Jan 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

/cc @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-misc @macsko @dom4ha @AxeZhan

Added the 2024 annual report for SIG-Scheduling.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #8271

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from AxeZhan January 18, 2025 04:39
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. label Jan 18, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from macsko and dom4ha January 18, 2025 04:39
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sanposhiho: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: kubernetes/sig-scheduling-misc.

Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

/cc @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-misc @macsko @dom4ha @AxeZhan

Added the 2024 annual report for SIG-Scheduling.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/annual-reports Issues or PRs related to the annual reports cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 18, 2025
sanposhiho
sanposhiho commented Jan 18, 2025
View reviewed changes
sig-scheduling/annual-report-2024.md
- Alpha
- [4816 - DRA Prioritized List](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-scheduling/4816-dra-prioritized-list) - v1.32
- [4832 - Asynchronous Preemption](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-scheduling/4832-async-preemption) - v1.32

- Beta
- [3633 - Introduce MatchLabelKeys and MismatchLabelKeys to PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-scheduling/3633-matchlabelkeys-to-podaffinity) - v1.31
- [4247 - Per-plugin callback functions for efficient requeueing in the scheduling queue](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-scheduling/4247-queueinghint/README.md) - v1.32
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was lacking. The metadata is fixed at kubernetes/enhancements#5050.

sig-scheduling/annual-report-2024.md
- [ ] [README.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
- [ ] [CONTRIBUTING.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
- [x] [README.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
- [x] [CONTRIBUTING.md] reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
- [ ] Other contributing docs (e.g. in devel dir or contributor guide) reviewed for accuracy and updated if needed
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, actually I don't think we have paid attention enough to these docs. We should review and update some docs (e.g., need to mention QHint at the queue doc etc)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Opened #8289 to track this problem

@sanposhiho
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @alculquicondor @Huang-Wei @ahg-g

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 18, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 19, 2025
@kerthcet
Copy link
Member

Thanks @sanposhiho LGTM

@macsko
Copy link
Member

macsko commented Jan 20, 2025

lgtm

alculquicondor
alculquicondor reviewed Jan 20, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@alculquicondor alculquicondor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot @sanposhiho!

@dom4ha
Copy link
Member

dom4ha commented Jan 20, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 21, 2025
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Member

/assign @BenTheElder
as our Liaison

@dom4ha
Copy link
Member

dom4ha commented Jan 22, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 22, 2025
soltysh
soltysh approved these changes Apr 8, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
from steering pov

/label tide/merge-method-squash

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Apr 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sanposhiho, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9c782ba into kubernetes:master Apr 8, 2025
3 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Needs Triage to Done in SIG Scheduling Apr 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Huang-Wei Huang-Wei Huang-Wei left review comments

@wzshiming wzshiming wzshiming left review comments

@ingvagabund ingvagabund ingvagabund left review comments

@soltysh soltysh soltysh approved these changes

@AxeZhan AxeZhan Awaiting requested review from AxeZhan

@macsko macsko Awaiting requested review from macsko

@dom4ha dom4ha Awaiting requested review from dom4ha

@alculquicondor alculquicondor Awaiting requested review from alculquicondor

Assignees

@BenTheElder BenTheElder

@alculquicondor alculquicondor

@Huang-Wei Huang-Wei

@ahg-g ahg-g

@dom4ha dom4ha

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/annual-reports Issues or PRs related to the annual reports cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
SIG Scheduling
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2024 Annual Report: SIG Scheduling