Skip to content

Conversation

ShaikYams97
Copy link

This pull request updates the wait command in the nginx ingress setup documentation to address timing issues on slower systems. The original documentation suggested waiting for the ingress controller pod readiness, but did not account for the time required for ingress-nginx-admission-patch and ingress-nginx-admission-create jobs to complete, especially on slower networks or systems.

Changes:

1.)Added a command to wait for the ingress-nginx-admission-patch job to complete before checking the readiness of the ingress controller.
2.)Updated command sequence:
kubectl wait --namespace ingress-nginx
--for=condition=complete job/ingress-nginx-admission-patch
--timeout=30s
&&
kubectl wait --namespace ingress-nginx
--for=condition=ready pod
--selector=app.kubernetes.io/component=controller
--timeout=90s
This improvement will prevent premature command errors (such as no matching resources found) by ensuring the patch job has completed before readiness is checked.

Issue Reference: Resolves #2293

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Nov 2, 2024

CLA Signed


The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ShaikYams97
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign aojea for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 2, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @ShaikYams97!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kind 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kind has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Nov 2, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ShaikYams97. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 2, 2024
@BenTheElder BenTheElder removed the request for review from neolit123 January 23, 2025 20:14
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

@strongjz @cpanato @tao12345666333 thoughts?

@stmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test
/lgtm

Looks safe, and I think questions were answered.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 21, 2025
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

cc @aojea

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix wait condition script for nginx ingress

6 participants