Skip to content

🌱 Improve CC RefVersionsUpToDate condition message #12472

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Jul 10, 2025

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
The current condition message makes it sound like it's an error to not use the latest apiVersion (which it is not).

So tried to rephrase a bit

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 10, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/clusterclass Issues or PRs related to clusterclass label Jul 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Jul 10, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold
Would like to hear Fabrizio's opinion on this one

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 10, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @fabriziopandini

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-cc-improve-condition branch from f6dee4b to 17c44f8 Compare July 14, 2025 10:33
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

@fabriziopandini PTAL

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 06d467f00de28ea8b144b975df764ad69117b610

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 14, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 0d1b567 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jul 14, 2025
18 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.11 milestone Jul 14, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-cc-improve-condition branch July 14, 2025 11:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/clusterclass Issues or PRs related to clusterclass cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants