Skip to content

🐛 test framework: fix e2e config provider's kustomize resource loading using a go getter url #12360

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

drinkingjasminegreentea
Copy link

@drinkingjasminegreentea drinkingjasminegreentea commented Jun 14, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it: This PR fixes a bug with loading kustomize resources from a go getter url. We only need to append the absolute path to provider.version.value if it's url scheme is file or empty. Removed the extra check for version type to check if it's kustomize or url, because both types can have either folder path or url values.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
fixes #12264

/area/e2e-testing

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jun 14, 2025

CLA Signed

  • ✅login: drinkingjasminegreentea / (758b32d)

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Jun 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is currently missing an area label, which is used to identify the modified component when generating release notes.

Area labels can be added by org members by writing /area ${COMPONENT} in a comment

Please see the labels list for possible areas.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sbueringer for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jun 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @drinkingjasminegreentea!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @drinkingjasminegreentea. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 14, 2025
@drinkingjasminegreentea drinkingjasminegreentea changed the title 🐛 test framework: e2e config provider does not support git go getter value 🐛 test framework: fix e2e config provider's kustomize resource loading from go getter url Jun 14, 2025
@drinkingjasminegreentea drinkingjasminegreentea changed the title 🐛 test framework: fix e2e config provider's kustomize resource loading from go getter url 🐛 test framework: fix e2e config provider's kustomize resource loading using a go getter url Jun 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test framework: e2e config provider does not support git go getter value
2 participants