Skip to content

⚠️ Align KubeadmConfig to kubeadm v1beta4 types #12282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #10708

Area example:
/area provider/bootstrap-kubeadm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. area/provider/bootstrap-kubeadm Issues or PRs related to CAPBK cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from elmiko and JoelSpeed May 23, 2025 13:05
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label May 23, 2025
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the align-kubeadmconfig-to-kubeadm-v1beta4 branch from d49f5da to c15bfb8 Compare May 24, 2025 11:17
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label May 24, 2025
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini changed the title [WIP] ⚠️ Align KubeadmConfig to kubeadm v1beta4 types ⚠️ Align KubeadmConfig to kubeadm v1beta4 types May 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 24, 2025
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fabriziopandini: The /test command needs one or more targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-build-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-blocking-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-latestk8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-upgrade-1-33-1-34-main
/test pull-cluster-api-test-main
/test pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-verify-main

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
pull-cluster-api-build-main
pull-cluster-api-e2e-blocking-main
pull-cluster-api-test-main
pull-cluster-api-verify-main

In response to this:

/test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-latestk8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-upgrade-1-33-1-34-main

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-latestk8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-upgrade-1-33-1-34-main

1 similar comment
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-latestk8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-upgrade-1-33-1-34-main

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the align-kubeadmconfig-to-kubeadm-v1beta4 branch from 0de7ada to b3b3f41 Compare May 26, 2025 14:41
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-latestk8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-upgrade-1-33-1-34-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the align-kubeadmconfig-to-kubeadm-v1beta4 branch from 4f6b121 to 85f315c Compare May 26, 2025 21:23
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-latestk8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-upgrade-1-33-1-34-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-latestk8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-upgrade-1-33-1-34-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

/hold
(in case you want further reviews)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 27, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 27, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 1bef70f1b369fd05a84d15330e19dd033ba7ef5d

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 27, 2025
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 27, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 51ab638 into kubernetes-sigs:main May 27, 2025
26 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.11 milestone May 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/bootstrap-kubeadm Issues or PRs related to CAPBK cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement support for kubeadm v1beta4 API
4 participants