Skip to content

⚠️ Rename MHC unhealthyConditions to unhealthyNodeConditions #12245

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented May 19, 2025

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
We are doing this because:

  • Eventually we also want to support MHC based on Machine conditions
  • By calling the field unhealthyNodeConditions it's a lot clearer that we are matching against Node conditions (not Machine conditions)

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Part of #10852

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels May 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 19, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer mentioned this pull request May 19, 2025
71 tasks
@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/machinehealthcheck Issues or PRs related to machinehealthchecks label May 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label May 19, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] ⚠️ Rename MHC unhealthyConditions to unhealthyNodeConditions ⚠️ Rename MHC unhealthyConditions to unhealthyNodeConditions May 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 19, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-rename-mhc-nodeconditions branch from 17400af to 4a39946 Compare May 19, 2025 16:55
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @fabriziopandini @JoelSpeed

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sgtm, I. will make another quick check after rebase

Note: depending on merge order, it might be required to add a line for this change in the migration notes

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-rename-mhc-nodeconditions branch from 4a39946 to 7fa6fee Compare May 20, 2025 11:46
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

@fabriziopandini Should be all fixed + PR is rebased

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Nothing to add from my part, changes look like we've covered what's needed, name change seems more descriptive, +1 from me

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 6f7cdd5464374abbec4370d315690bab7b7a3b7b

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit d9033b3 into kubernetes-sigs:main May 20, 2025
19 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.11 milestone May 20, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-rename-mhc-nodeconditions branch May 20, 2025 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/machinehealthcheck Issues or PRs related to machinehealthchecks cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants