Skip to content

DRA load testing #5742

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

DRA load testing #5742

wants to merge 8 commits into from
+2 −1

Conversation

nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor

@nojnhuh nojnhuh commented Jul 9, 2025

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests
  • cherry-pick candidate

Release note:

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 9, 2025
@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 9, 2025

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 9, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@nojnhuh: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-build

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-ci-entrypoint

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-aks

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-test

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apidiff

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiserver-ilb

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-custom-builds

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-dual-stack-with-ci-artifacts

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-ipv6-with-ci-artifacts

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-with-ci-artifacts

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-with-ci-artifacts-dra

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-optional

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-workload-upgrade

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-custom-builds

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-with-workload-custom-builds

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-perf-test-apiserver-availability

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-custom-builds

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-with-ci-artifacts

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apidiff

pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-build

pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-verify

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 9, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-custom-builds
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.82%. Comparing base (9f35e1a) to head (12929f9).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5742      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   52.83%   52.82%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         278      279       +1     
  Lines       29610    29629      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits        15645    15652       +7     
- Misses      13148    13160      +12     
  Partials      817      817

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 9, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

5 similar comments
@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 9, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 9, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 9, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 9, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 9, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

@jackfrancis
Copy link
Contributor

sigh not the test failure we're looking for

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 10, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

1 similar comment
@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 10, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-custom-builds

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 10, 2025

This periodic run hit the APIAvailability flake: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-ci-logs/logs/ci-kubernetes-e2e-azure-dra-scalability/1943134257585065984

This is the new info:

W0710 03:20:23.091522   37631 api_availability_measurement.go:114] failed to reach cluster API server: an error on the server ("[+]ping ok\n[+]log ok\n[-]etcd failed: reason withheld\n[+]etcd-readiness ok\n[+]informer-sync ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-apiserver-admission-initializer ok\n[+]poststarthook/generic-apiserver-start-informers ok\n[+]poststarthook/priority-and-fairness-config-consumer ok\n[+]poststarthook/priority-and-fairness-filter ok\n[+]poststarthook/storage-object-count-tracker-hook ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-apiextensions-informers ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-apiextensions-controllers ok\n[+]poststarthook/crd-informer-synced ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-system-namespaces-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-cluster-authentication-info-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-kube-apiserver-identity-lease-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-kube-apiserver-identity-lease-garbage-collector ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-legacy-token-tracking-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-service-ip-repair-controllers ok\n[+]poststarthook/rbac/bootstrap-roles ok\n[+]poststarthook/scheduling/bootstrap-system-priority-classes ok\n[+]poststarthook/priority-and-fairness-config-producer ok\n[+]poststarthook/bootstrap-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-kubernetes-service-cidr-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/aggregator-reload-proxy-client-cert ok\n[+]poststarthook/start-kube-aggregator-informers ok\n[+]poststarthook/apiservice-status-local-available-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/apiservice-status-remote-available-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/apiservice-registration-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/apiservice-discovery-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/kube-apiserver-autoregistration ok\n[+]autoregister-completion ok\n[+]poststarthook/apiservice-openapi-controller ok\n[+]poststarthook/apiservice-openapiv3-controller ok\n[+]shutdown ok\nreadyz check failed") has prevented the request from succeeding

Prettier:

[+]ping ok
[+]log ok
[-]etcd failed: reason withheld
[+]etcd-readiness ok
[+]informer-sync ok
[+]poststarthook/start-apiserver-admission-initializer ok
[+]poststarthook/generic-apiserver-start-informers ok
[+]poststarthook/priority-and-fairness-config-consumer ok
[+]poststarthook/priority-and-fairness-filter ok
[+]poststarthook/storage-object-count-tracker-hook ok
[+]poststarthook/start-apiextensions-informers ok
[+]poststarthook/start-apiextensions-controllers ok
[+]poststarthook/crd-informer-synced ok
[+]poststarthook/start-system-namespaces-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/start-cluster-authentication-info-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/start-kube-apiserver-identity-lease-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/start-kube-apiserver-identity-lease-garbage-collector ok
[+]poststarthook/start-legacy-token-tracking-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/start-service-ip-repair-controllers ok
[+]poststarthook/rbac/bootstrap-roles ok
[+]poststarthook/scheduling/bootstrap-system-priority-classes ok
[+]poststarthook/priority-and-fairness-config-producer ok
[+]poststarthook/bootstrap-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/start-kubernetes-service-cidr-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/aggregator-reload-proxy-client-cert ok
[+]poststarthook/start-kube-aggregator-informers ok
[+]poststarthook/apiservice-status-local-available-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/apiservice-status-remote-available-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/apiservice-registration-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/apiservice-discovery-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/kube-apiserver-autoregistration ok
[+]autoregister-completion ok
[+]poststarthook/apiservice-openapi-controller ok
[+]poststarthook/apiservice-openapiv3-controller ok
[+]shutdown ok
readyz check failed

I'll take a closer look later.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jont828 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@alaypatel07
Copy link

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-with-workload-custom-builds

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 11, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-with-workload-custom-builds

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 15, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-with-workload-custom-builds

@nojnhuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nojnhuh commented Jul 15, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-with-workload-custom-builds

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@nojnhuh: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-with-workload-custom-builds b6af279 link false /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-load-test-dra-with-workload-custom-builds

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
CAPZ Planning
Status: Todo
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@nojnhuh @k8s-ci-robot @jackfrancis @alaypatel07