Skip to content

Conversation

tarekabouzeid
Copy link
Member

Pull Request Template for Kubeflow manifests Issues

✏️ A brief description of the changes

I changed KFP version to 2.3.0

📦 List any dependencies that are required for this change

My PR depends on #

🐛 If this PR is related to an issue, please put the link to the issue here.

The following issues are related, because synchronizing manifests with KFP 2.3.0

✅ Contributor checklist


You can join the CNCF Slack and access our meetings at the Kubeflow Community website. Our channel on the CNCF Slack is here #kubeflow-platform.

- cluster.local/ns/kubeflow/sa/ml-pipeline-scheduledworkflow
- cluster.local/ns/kubeflow/sa/ml-pipeline-viewer-crd-service-account
- cluster.local/ns/kubeflow/sa/kubeflow-pipelines-cache
# allow access by any trusted principal
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here I will have to merge another PR first and help

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will fix it probably on Sunday and then merge. Otherwise it looks good.

@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member

You need to sign your commits according to DCO.

Signed-off-by: Tarek Abouzeid <tarek.abouzeid@teliacompany.com>
Signed-off-by: Tarek Abouzeid <tarek.abouzeid@teliacompany.com>
@tarekabouzeid tarekabouzeid force-pushed the synchronize-kubeflow-pipelines-manifests-2.3.0 branch from 1c387a7 to 41acc32 Compare September 10, 2024 11:06
@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member

juliusvonkohout commented Sep 10, 2024

No worries "HTTP response body: RBAC: access denied" in the tests is expected. I have to merge the authentication PR first and adjust this one here to fix it.

@rimolive
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@rimolive
Copy link
Member

@tarekabouzeid There is one test failling. Can you take a look?

/hold

@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member

juliusvonkohout commented Sep 10, 2024

@tarekabouzeid There is one test failling. Can you take a look?

/hold

As described above I will fix that on the weekend. But feel free to continue with the synchronization of other components.

Signed-off-by: juliusvonkohout <45896133+juliusvonkohout@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot removed the lgtm label Sep 14, 2024
@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member

Well hopefully argo updates to kustomize 5 soon, but that is out of scope for this PR.

@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@google-oss-prow
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: juliusvonkohout

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@juliusvonkohout
Copy link
Member

/unhold

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot merged commit afd72b1 into kubeflow:master Sep 14, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants