Skip to content

Implement starting values for NormOneBridge #994

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2020
Merged

Conversation

blegat
Copy link
Member

@blegat blegat commented Jan 5, 2020

See #684

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #994 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 96%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #994      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.26%   95.26%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          97       97              
  Lines       10803    10823      +20     
==========================================
+ Hits        10291    10310      +19     
- Misses        512      513       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/Bridges/Constraint/norm_to_lp.jl 91.48% <96%> (+0.69%) ⬆️
src/indextypes.jl 87.5% <0%> (+1.78%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b123627...733e511. Read the comment docs.

@@ -100,13 +100,17 @@ end
MOIT.normone1vtest(bridged_mock, config)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just a question: what's the point of running this test set here? it's not relevant to all the below tests right? I ask because in #976 I have multiple test sets but currently only run one of them in the bridge test file

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does not affect tests below but it still adds coverage. normone1f uses VAF functions and normone1v uses VOV. So this tests that the bridging and the getters of ConstraintPrimal and ConstrainDual work when the input function is VOV

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK I didn't realize it wasn't called elsewhere. I'll add both tests for spectral and for nuclear cones then.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wait no I misunderstood. it only works for the same test modulo the vov/vaf difference. so scrap what I said.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, so in your case you'll have to redo the mock dual and primal values so probably not worth it

@blegat blegat merged commit b55cc2e into master Jan 5, 2020
@odow odow deleted the bl/normone_start branch February 20, 2020 22:52
@blegat blegat added this to the v0.9.10 milestone Feb 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants