Skip to content

Prep for v1.41.0 #2773

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 9, 2025
Merged

Prep for v1.41.0 #2773

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 9, 2025

Conversation

odow
Copy link
Member

@odow odow commented Jun 6, 2025

Basic

  • version field of Project.toml has been updated
    - If a breaking change, increment the MAJOR field and reset others to 0
    - If adding new features, increment the MINOR field and reset PATCH to 0
    - If adding bug fixes or documentation changes, increment the PATCH field

Documentation

  • Add a new entry to docs/src/changelog.md, following existing style

Tests

@odow
Copy link
Member Author

odow commented Jun 6, 2025

@blegat before I merge this, take a look at v1.40.2...master and see if you're happy.

Copy link
Member

@blegat blegat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@blegat
Copy link
Member

blegat commented Jun 6, 2025

Let's run ci even though I don't see how we could have done anything breaking:
https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl/actions/runs/15498125690

@odow
Copy link
Member Author

odow commented Jun 9, 2025

MOA failure looks like a spurious change due to the last release of HiGHS. I'll take a look.

(Also note that the checklist includes a solver-tests.yml run. I run it for every release)

@odow
Copy link
Member Author

odow commented Jun 9, 2025

MOA failure is a presolve bug in HiGHS scaling issue in MOA: jump-dev/MultiObjectiveAlgorithms.jl#104

@odow odow merged commit fa61f9c into master Jun 9, 2025
31 checks passed
@odow odow deleted the od/v1.41.0 branch June 9, 2025 04:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants