-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
Support SQLAlchemy 2.0 #91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Support SQLAlchemy 2.0 #91
Conversation
Under some circunstances, such as prepping an aliased subquery to be joined later on, the model entity is missing, provoking an error when trying to apply filters. (cherry picked from commit edc7c24)
…tyle?) (cherry picked from commit b6791e3)
(cherry picked from commit 203d401)
This property is removed in SQLAlchemy 2.x
… .gitignore This allows Tox to find all Python versions when using pyenv
drop_all() makes the 'bind' positional argument required
Specify compatible versions of SQLAlchemy and SQLAlchemy-Utils for Python, SQLAlchemy versions
Simplifies tox expressions and doesn't change anything fundamental about this library. 0.38.3 dropped support for Python 3.4 and 3.5 which sqlalchemy-filters never supported in the first place
Maintaining backwards compatibility with |
|
||
venv | ||
.venv | ||
.idea | ||
build |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would have to agree with that. Users are not going to get any updates (security or otherwise) for sqlalchemy if they are on those old versions, so why should they expect to get updates for sqlalchemy-filters? If they want to use an unsupported version of sqlalchemy, then they can also use an unsupported version of sqlalchemy-filters... |
Fixes #83.
I lost write access and cannot make further updates to the PR at #84, so opening this against my personal account.