Skip to content

In this project, we used Deepfool and FGSM to perform adversarial attacks on the MNIST dataset, reducing image recognition accuracy to 2% and 22%, respectively. Then, we used APE-GAN and the U-net from the diffusion model to clean the images, restoring the model's recognition accuracy to 80% and 96%, respectively.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

johnson70630/Addressing-Adversarial-Attacks-on-Computer-Images-Using-APE-GAN-and-Diffusion-Model

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Addressing-Adversarial-Attacks-on-Computer-Images-Using-APE-GAN-and-Diffusion-Model

Neural networks are susceptible to adversarial attacks, where adding imperceptible perturbations to the input can mislead trained neural networks to predict incorrect classes. In this project, we used Deepfool and FGSM to perform adversarial attacks on the MNIST dataset, reducing image recognition accuracy to 2% and 22%, respectively. Then, we used APE-GAN and the U-net from the diffusion model to clean the images, restoring the model's recognition accuracy to 80% and 96%, respectively.

Open Sources

poster session video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pyfJ1MkRGo&t=57s

public code & poster: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1fkCfwQb_DT3DPH6-osgNwtI0ifQ6pasz

Supplements

About

In this project, we used Deepfool and FGSM to perform adversarial attacks on the MNIST dataset, reducing image recognition accuracy to 2% and 22%, respectively. Then, we used APE-GAN and the U-net from the diffusion model to clean the images, restoring the model's recognition accuracy to 80% and 96%, respectively.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published