Allow single-digit substrate depths #150
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
alindeman-NOAA
force-pushed
the
substrate-depth-length
branch
from
9e9dcf8 to
66c1eaf
Compare
|
@jeremiaheb Do you have any concerns about allowing single-digit substrate depths? Should there be a higher minimum or is allowing any positive number OK? |
|
We discussed this on a call. Good to deploy it 👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A diver from the July STX mission reported that there were some very shallow sites where these depths needed to be entered as, e.g.,
4. They worked around it by entering04in the mean time.