Removed the javax.xml.bind.DatatypeConverter as part of enabling Java 9 #220
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since the javax.xml.bind package is removed in Java 9, it would help if this package was removed from the code. This was replaced with Apache Commons and not java.util.Base64 because the encode function there requires compilation with java 8.
Since the javax.xml.bind package is removed in Java 9, it would help if this package was removed from the code. This was replaced with Apache Commons and not java.util.Base64 because the encode function there requires compilation with java 8.
|
cc @jenkinsci/java11-support |
|
Relates to https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-55941 FYI @kelliejos @jpricketMSFT @kasubram |
alecharp
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since the javax.xml.bind package is removed in Java 9, it would help if
this package was removed from the code.
This was replaced with Apache Commons and not java.util.Base64 because
the encode function there requires compilation with java 8.