-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
editorial: Relying Party Endpoints Section and terms #863
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: versione-corrente
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR restructures the Relying Party endpoints documentation to resolve issue #862 by creating a hierarchical structure with proper terminology alignment between EN/IT versions. The main purpose is to eliminate content duplication and organize endpoints logically.
Key changes include:
- Restructured documentation hierarchy with a new parent endpoints file
- Updated terminology to consistently use "Relying Party Provider Backend" instead of "Relying Party Backend"
- Reorganized endpoint documentation into separate files for remote flows and provider backend endpoints
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 21 out of 21 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
File | Description |
---|---|
docs/*/relying-party-endpoints.rst |
New parent files providing overview and including child endpoint files |
docs/*/relying-party-remote-flow-endpoints.rst |
New files containing remote flow endpoints and erasure endpoint documentation |
docs/*/relying-party-provider-backend-endpoint.rst |
Updated files with provider backend endpoints and terminology fixes |
docs/*/relying-party-endpoint.rst |
EN version removed, IT version updated with new structure and terminology |
docs/*/endpoints.rst |
Updated includes to reference new parent endpoint file |
Multiple reference files | Updated cross-references to point to new file structure |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
docs/it/relying-party-remote-flow-endpoints.rst:1
- Grammatical error: 'carried fulfilled' should be 'fulfilled'.
.. include:: ../common/common_definitions.rst
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
- The request is malformed, missing required parameters (e.g., header parameters or integrity assertion), or includes invalid and unknown parameters. | ||
* - ``401 Unauthorized`` | ||
- ``unauthorized`` | ||
- The request could not be carried fulfilled due to invalid authentication by the User. |
Copilot
AI
Oct 15, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Grammatical error: 'carried fulfilled' should be 'fulfilled'.
- The request could not be carried fulfilled due to invalid authentication by the User. | |
- The request could not be fulfilled due to invalid authentication by the User. |
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
This PR aims to resolve #862 using an hierarchical structure with proper terminology, no content duplication, and EN/IT alignment.
the PR has:
relying-party-endpoints.rst
→relying-party-remote-flow-endpoints.rst
relying-party-endpoints.rst
with introduction and includesIt also made the following terminology alignment:
For achieing that, it has:
^
) to included files for proper editorial hierarchyFiles Modified
relying-party-endpoints.rst
(EN/IT) - New parent filesrelying-party-remote-flow-endpoints.rst
(EN/IT) - Renamed and updatedrelying-party-provider-backend-endpoint.rst
(EN/IT) - Updated titles and referencesendpoints.rst
(EN/IT) - Updated includeshow-to-read-spec.rst
(EN/IT) - Updated references