Skip to content

refactor: ⚡ refactored setup.js to use inquirer #8

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 4, 2025

Conversation

ioncakephper
Copy link
Owner

@ioncakephper ioncakephper commented Jul 4, 2025

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.

  • Test A
  • Test B

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Refactor setup.js to utilize Inquirer for user input collection, update package.json to include Inquirer dependency, change file reference from package.json to project.json, and improve handling of non-existent files.

Why are these changes being made?

These changes enhance user experience by providing more robust prompts and validations through Inquirer, addressing previous shortcomings of using readline. Additionally, addressing file reference ensures the code targets the correct configuration file, dynamically handling situations when files are absent, thus improving user guidance and preventing errors in the setup process. These updates streamline setup interactions and improve error management.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review by Korbit AI

Korbit automatically attempts to detect when you fix issues in new commits.
Category Issue Status
Security Insecure Handling of Codecov Token ▹ view
Files scanned
File Path Reviewed
setup.js

Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.

Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.

Loving Korbit!? Share us on LinkedIn Reddit and X

setup.js Outdated
content = content.replace(new RegExp('{{CONTACT_EMAIL}}', 'g'), inputs.contactEmail);
content = content.replace(new RegExp('{{LICENSE_YEAR}}', 'g'), inputs.licenseYear);
content = content.replace(new RegExp('{{GITHUB_USERNAME}}', 'g'), inputs.githubUsername);
content = content.replace(new RegExp('{{CODECOV_TOKEN}}', 'g'), inputs.codecovToken || '');
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Insecure Handling of Codecov Token category Security

Tell me more
What is the issue?

The script directly embeds a security token (Codecov token) into files without any safeguards or validation.

Why this matters

If the token is accidentally committed or the files are exposed, it could lead to unauthorized access to Codecov services and potential exposure of private code coverage data.

Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview

Remove the Codecov token from being embedded in files. Instead, provide instructions for users to manually configure their Codecov token in their CI/CD environment variables or through Codecov's secure mechanisms.

Provide feedback to improve future suggestions

Nice Catch Incorrect Not in Scope Not in coding standard Other

💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.

@ioncakephper ioncakephper merged commit 5e9d1e7 into main Jul 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@ioncakephper ioncakephper deleted the chore/setup-inquirer branch July 4, 2025 08:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant