Skip to content

Add comprehensive input validation for training hyperparameters in ControlNet Flux training script #11980

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SyedaAnshrahGillani
Copy link

Summary

This pull request enhances the robustness of the training script by introducing explicit parameter validation, improving error messaging, and aligning the behavior with user expectations and Diffusers' philosophy of educational code examples.

Key Improvements

  • Added comprehensive validation for training parameters
  • Introduced clear ValueError messages for invalid configurations
  • Implemented warnings for potentially problematic parameter combinations
  • Ensured no regressions in existing functionality

Checklist

  • Code follows the existing style and conventions
  • Added comprehensive parameter validation
  • Maintained backward compatibility
  • Clear and helpful error messages
  • No breaking changes to existing functionality

- Add extensive validation for training parameters like learning_rate, batch_size, epochs, etc.
- Validate that numeric parameters are within valid ranges (e.g., positive values, betas in [0,1))
- Add reasonable bounds checking for resolution (64-4096 pixels)
- Include helpful warnings for potentially problematic parameter combinations
- Improve user experience by catching invalid configurations early with clear error messages

This prevents runtime errors and training failures caused by invalid hyperparameters,
making the training script more robust and user-friendly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant