-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
Improved ID Auto-Population Logic for Carrier Creation(#536) #1347
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Improved ID Auto-Population Logic for Carrier Creation(#536) #1347
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Nirvan-Bobde30, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request enhances the carrier creation process by introducing robust client-side validation for the 'Party ID' field, limiting its length to 20 characters. It also refines the auto-population logic for this ID, allowing users to manually input or override the generated ID, thereby improving data integrity and user experience.
Highlights
- Party ID Validation: Implemented client-side validation for the 'Party ID' field during carrier creation, ensuring that the entered ID does not exceed 20 characters. An error message is displayed if the limit is surpassed.
- Enhanced Party ID Auto-Population: Modified the auto-population behavior for the 'Party ID' field. The system will now only auto-generate an ID if the user has not manually entered or modified the field, providing more control to the user.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request improves the ID auto-population logic for carrier creation by adding client-side validation for the Party ID. The changes are well-implemented, primarily affecting CreateCarrier.vue. My review includes feedback on untranslated locale strings, a suggestion to improve code readability, and a critical fix for a missing validation check to prevent submitting an empty Party ID.
| if (this.carrier.partyId.length > 20) { | ||
| showToast(translate('Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.')) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's a validation check for the partyId length, but no check to ensure it's not empty. If a user enters a carrier name (which auto-populates the ID) and then manually clears the ID field, an empty partyId would be sent to the server. This could lead to creating records with invalid data. It's important to add a check to ensure the partyId is not empty before proceeding. I recommend using an existing translation key like Please provide a value for the toast message.
if (!this.carrier.partyId?.trim()) {
showToast(translate('Please provide a value'));
return;
}
if (this.carrier.partyId.length > 20) {
showToast(translate('Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.'))
return
}
src/locales/es.json
Outdated
| "Pack using default packaging": "Empacar utilizando el empaque predeterminado", | ||
| "Packed": "Empacado", | ||
| "Partial rejections": "Rechazo Parcial", | ||
| "Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.": "Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new translation key has been added, but the value is still in English. Please provide the Spanish translation.
| "Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.": "Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.", | |
| "Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.": "El ID del participante no puede tener más de 20 caracteres.", |
src/locales/ja.json
Outdated
| "Pack using default packaging": "デフォルトの梱包材を使用して梱包", | ||
| "Packed": "梱包済み", | ||
| "Partial rejections": "Partial rejections", | ||
| "Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.": "Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new translation key has been added, but the value is still in English. Please provide the Japanese translation.
| "Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.": "Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.", | |
| "Party ID cannot be more than 20 characters.": "パーティIDは20文字を超えることはできません。", |
| if (value === '') return; | ||
| this.carrier.partyId.length <= 20 ? (this as any).$refs.partyId.$el.classList.add('ion-valid') : (this as any).$refs.partyId.$el.classList.add('ion-invalid'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For improved readability and to be explicit, it's better to use the value constant, which is already available from the event. Additionally, refactoring the long ternary operator into a standard if/else block enhances code clarity.
if (value.length <= 20) {
(this as any).$refs.partyId.$el.classList.add('ion-valid');
} else {
(this as any).$refs.partyId.$el.classList.add('ion-invalid');
}
Related Issues
#536
Short Description and Why It's Useful
Screenshots of Visual Changes before/after (If There Are Any)
Contribution and Currently Important Rules Acceptance