Skip to content

Add maven-central publishing placeholder #124

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2025

Conversation

marko-bekhta
Copy link
Member

@marko-bekhta marko-bekhta commented Apr 11, 2025

The thing is that the current config works fine for the OSSRH publishing. Once we switch to the maven-central publishing API we'd need that second config (mavenCentral). So the idea @dreab8 and I had was to include the "placeholder" configs in the repositories with mavenCentral set to active: NEVER and then once we switch, it'll be easier for whoever works on the change to apply it.

@sebersole
Copy link
Member

Can you describe the point of this change?

@marko-bekhta
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, sure I can! should I?
😃 🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈

@marko-bekhta
Copy link
Member Author

updated the description 😃🤞🏻

@sebersole
Copy link
Member

I am a bit confused then. Did you not use JReleaser + the new Central Pulishing Portal for the 2 releases y'all did?

Or did you just use JReleaser, but continue to use OSSRH?

@marko-bekhta
Copy link
Member Author

oh, ok yes... it's JReleaser + OSSRH. To switch to this central-publishing-api we'd need to request the migration (and from what it seems, it'll affect all the projects we publish, so the plan is to prepare all projects for JReleaser with OSSRH publishing. Then once all are ready, request the migration, switch the config from OSSRH to CentralPublishing and 🤞🏻)

@sebersole
Copy link
Member

Ok, that's the bit I was missing.

@sebersole sebersole merged commit 4391e09 into hibernate:main Apr 14, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants