Skip to content

Avoid boost::optional::has_value() #1622

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2025
Merged

Conversation

rustam-gamidov-here
Copy link
Collaborator

There are checks on old boost versions without this method

Relates-To: MINOR

There are checks on old boost versions without this method

Relates-To: MINOR
Signed-off-by: Rustam Gamidov <ext-rustam.gamidov@here.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.33%. Comparing base (54203ce) to head (6c459de).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1622      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.30%   80.33%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         348      348              
  Lines       13932    13934       +2     
  Branches     1489     1490       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        11188    11193       +5     
+ Misses       2146     2144       -2     
+ Partials      598      597       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@rustam-gamidov-here rustam-gamidov-here merged commit 7d33c0b into master Jul 11, 2025
24 checks passed
@rustam-gamidov-here rustam-gamidov-here deleted the rga/remove-has-value branch July 11, 2025 09:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants