Docs/waypoint_template - variable_options add variable_type #1283
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
huikang
previously approved these changes
May 16, 2025
huikang
approved these changes
May 19, 2025
|
This PR is more than 2 weeks old. Please remove the stale label, update, or comment if this PR is still valid and relevant, otherwise it will be closed in 7 days. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🛠️ Description
variable_optionsblock has a required argument ofvariable_type🏗️ Acceptance tests
Output from acceptance testing:
$ make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccXXX' ...PCI review checklist
If applicable, I've documented a plan to revert these changes if they require more than reverting the pull request.
If applicable, I've worked with GRC to document the impact of any changes to security controls.
Examples of changes to controls include access controls, encryption, logging, etc.
If applicable, I've worked with GRC to ensure compliance due to a significant change to the in-scope PCI environment.
Examples include changes to operating systems, ports, protocols, services, cryptography-related components, PII processing code, etc.